Effective Interviewing and Interrogation Techniques, Third Edition is a practical manual which provides the forensic practitioner/investigator. PDF | On Jan 1, , C.A. Meissner and others published Interview and techniques on investigative outcomes, it is important to consider the accuracy of the .. and information-gathering approaches were viewed as effective tools to elicit. Effective interviewing and interrogation techniques - monpaysofchlesspi.ga Pages · · Nail the Job Interview Dynamite Answers to Interview Questions.
|Language:||English, French, Arabic|
|Genre:||Business & Career|
|ePub File Size:||17.70 MB|
|PDF File Size:||18.32 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Sign up for free]|
Effective Interviewing and Interrogation Techniques, Second Edition, is completely revised and updated so as to cover all the information a student needs to. Often, particularly in the private sector, the words interview and interrogation are used . effective and more subtle methods of coercion than physical threats or violence. For the Training manuals in pdf format: monpaysofchlesspi.ga Effective Interviewing and Interrogation Techniques (2nd ed.) by Nathan J. Gordon. Read online, or download in secure PDF format.
A Community of Research Scholars
FAINT is applicable to all forensic type interviews and incorporates the assessment of nonverbal behavior, projective analysis of unwitting verbal cues, statement analysis and the Morgan Interview Thematic Technique MITT.
This volume teaches how to combine, apply and quantify these techniques to reach a numerical conclusion to the truthfulness of the interviewee.
The third edition expands chapters on torture, assessing the interview, statement analysis, MITT, and interrogation.
It contains new chapters on passenger screening, and report writing, along with new case studies. Also covered are ways to maximize the collection of information from a prospective employee, and legal considerations.
Gordon and Fleisher have created a one-stop guide to mastering the art of credibility assessment during an interview, with successfully tested techniques for obtaining a confession from guilty suspects. Forensic practitioners, law enforcement, the intelligence community, the private security sector, attorneys, and forensic and criminal justice students will all find this volume a valuable resource.
SlideShare Explore Search You. Submit Search. Successfully reported this slideshow. We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Gordon PDF Online. Upcoming SlideShare. Like this presentation? Why not share! Embed Size px.
Start on. Show related SlideShares at end. WordPress Shortcode. Published in: Full Name Comment goes here. Are you sure you want to Yes No. Be the first to like this.
No Downloads. The core intelligence collection experience of the report members is reflected in the more cohesive output of the Phase II report. The context of intelligence collection was explored to include environmental factors such as detainee interaction with guards and other detainees and the careful control of the detention environment from making food and reading materials available to the detainee down to the timing of interactions with the detainee.
Effective Interviewing and Interrogation Techniques
The Phase II report was not without weakness and failed to include a broad enough sample for their case studies. The case studies were in-depth explorations of the interrogations and included teaching notes and observations, but two cases is an extremely small sample size considering the thousands of interrogations performed by military interrogators in Guantanamo, Afghanistan, and Iraq that are available for review.
The most subtle, but perhaps the most egregious oversight, is the failure of the Phase II report to clearly identify the authors, advisors, and experts involved in the study. Unlike the Phase I report, the authors of the Phase II report are anonymous, an oversight that precludes 19 the identification of author bias. David Becker of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
The inclusion of Mr. Becker as an expert on educing information is questionable considering his former position as the Chief of the Interrogation Control Element at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba where he oversaw controversial interrogations and was directly involved in the assessment and review of questionable — and in some cases illegal — interrogation methods Senate Committee on Armed Services Without the author information provided in the Phase I report, the link between Mr. The polar opposite of non-coercive interrogation methods are enhanced interrogation techniques, the generic label given to ten interrogation methods referred to in a Department of Justice memorandum to the Central Intelligence Agency, methods that had never before been authorized for use in custodial interviews Office of the Inspector General A discussion of 20 interrogation techniques must include the controversial enhanced interrogation techniques — the same interrogation techniques suggested for review by Mr.
Becker at Guantanamo — including stress positions, prolonged isolation and sensory deprivation, threats of harm to person, and waterboarding. The report attempts to cover the moral, ethical, medical, and legal ramifications of the use of enhanced interrogation techniques and is a good start towards fully exploring and defining the limits of interrogation practices.
Unfortunately, the evidence on the efficacy of each technique lacks real substance and relies primarily on anecdotal evidence rather than scientific studies and in-depth analysis. The legal evidence, and supporting medical analysis, was better supported by citing established case law and legal precedents and can be given more weight than the anecdotal evidence put forward on efficacy.
Beyond the morality of the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, the legality of their use must be taken into consideration to ensure that intelligence gathered is able to be used in prosecutions and to secure convictions.
Despite the limitations on proving efficacy, the Leave No Marks report is of interest when debating the use of different interrogation methods. The legal analysis provided for each interrogation technique is valuable for a simple reason: if the technique is illegal to use there is no point in debating its efficacy.
Effective Interviewing and Interrogation Techniques (2nd ed.)
Professors Laurel E. Fletcher and Eric Stover of the University of California, Berkeley partnered with the Center for Constitutional Rights to produce a qualitative study specifically aimed at identifying the impact of U. The partnership resulted in the publication of 22 Guantanamo and Its Aftermath: U. Because of this lack of focus on interrogation methods, the study is not an extraordinary resource in the debate between using military interrogations or law enforcement interviews for terrorism suspects.
One aspect of the study that was interesting was the exploration of detention procedures as an adjunct to interrogation methods rather than being reviewed as unrelated to interrogations.
The Aftermath study has another feature in common with the Leave No Mark report: both were completed by non-governmental organizations that are more concerned with protecting and advancing human rights than with advancing the art and science of intelligence collection. As a result, it must be understood that both studies may be advocating for human rights advancement rather than being truly objective, and this potential bias must be taken into consideration when judging the value of the reports.
Former Guantanamo detainees have been through a unique ordeal and they may feel wronged by the U. Indeed, recent events have shown that just the accusation of complicity in alleged torture can financially 24 benefit the accusers, as in the case of former Guantanamo detainees in the United Kingdom who are set to receive millions of dollars each without having to prove their allegations UK to pay ex-Guantanamo detainees The actual findings of the Church Report are classified, but an unclassified Executive Summary was released by the Department of Defense.
The Executive Summary examined many aspects of interrogation operations, including failures of communication and dissemination and the causes of detainee abuse, but the exploration of the purpose of military interrogations and the development of interrogation policy is of primary interest for this review.
The Church Report Executive Summary gives the impression that the development of interrogation techniques and interrogation policy used by the Department of Defense to question terrorism suspects was created in an ad-hoc manner and was not the result of scientific data on efficacy.
In conclusion, a review of the available literature shows that there are acknowledged gaps in the area of intelligence collection, specifically, a lack of empirical data that shows what approaches work on detained terrorists in both short and long-term detention situations. This information must be captured and studied in order to identify the best policies and procedures to gain intelligence on our adversaries and to secure the nation.
One reason this information has not been studied in the past is a lack of data sources on interrogation performance over the long-term. Prior to Guantanamo, the long-term detention of large numbers of terrorist suspects has been a rare occurrence. Past experiences have been with a small number of terrorist suspects being detained as part of criminal investigations following successful terrorist attacks.
These suspects were then indicted and moved quickly into the criminal justice system. Data on long-term interrogations is now available for review from detention facilities like Guantanamo where law enforcement, military intelligence, and intelligence agencies have all conducted interrogations. There were 24, interrogations conducted at Guantanamo during the first three years of operations there Department of Defense , a facility that has now been open for nearly nine years and has held less than persons compared to the thousands of persons detained in Iraq and Afghanistan.
A full study of the efficacy of interrogations of detainees in military custody does not appear to have been completed, despite those interrogations being at the center of the debates over coercive versus non-coercive interrogation methods and law enforcement 27 methods versus military intelligence methods. The facility at Guantanamo is an interesting case since it contains a unique cross section of ethnicities, terrorist actors, and terrorist organizations not found in the more homogenous detainee populations in Afghanistan and Iraq.
A reasonable study would require full access to the classified interrogation records of detainees in order to statistically map the number of interrogations, the approaches used for each interrogation, and the results of the interrogations. The value, quality, and usefulness of the collected intelligence must be objectively assessed using multiple members of the intelligence community to ensure that one view does not dominate the analysis.
The length of time that the detainees have been incarcerated at Guantanamo should have allowed for additional intelligence collection tasking, intelligence that could be used to corroborate or contradict the original detainee reporting, thus allowing the truthfulness of the detainee to be determined and the efficacy of the interrogation methods to be evaluated. Without a study of the efficacy of the various interrogation methods employed by the different collection agencies, policymakers do not have the information needed to make informed decisions about the future of interrogations of terrorism suspects.
Without clear guidance, the U.
January 20, Associated Press. Cassell, Paul G. Center for Constituional Rights. Guantanamo Bay Habeas Decision Scorecard.
Department of Defense. Guantanamo Justice Center: About Us. July 30, Gudjonsson, Gisli H.
The Lonestar Project: What We Know About Prison Gangs in Texas
The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions. Hoboken: Wiley, Hoffman, Bruce.
April 20, Intelligence Science Board. Study on Educing Information: Foundations for the Future.
Isikoff, Michael. January 16, Office of the Inspector General. Washington, DC: U. Department of Justice, Without the author information provided in the Phase I report, the link between Mr. Another issue is that despite the extraction of confessions through psychological pressure, the ratio of true to false confessions extracted is unknown.
This volume teaches how to combine, apply and quantify these techniques to reach a numerical conclusion to the truthfulness of the interviewee. The inclusion of Mr. One aspect of the study that was interesting was the exploration of detention procedures as an adjunct to interrogation methods rather than being reviewed as unrelated to interrogations.
- O GATO MALHADO E A ANDORINHA SINHA PDF
- 12 STEPS AND 12 TRADITIONS EBOOK
- ORACLE SOA SUITE 12C HANDBOOK PDF
- THE LAND OF STORIES THE WISHING SPELL PDF
- HANDBOOK OF BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE PEPTIDES PDF
- COMPTIA A+ 220-801 AND 220-802 AUTHORIZED CERT GUIDE PDF
- PDF DATEI IN WORD UMWANDELN OHNE
- ANGELS AND DEMONS EBOOK
- HP PAVILION DV6 SERVICE MANUAL.PDF